In the simplest works, the heroes will need to get to a place X, or obtain an object Y. The Odyssey involves the former for most of the book, with Odyssesus trying to get home to Ithaca. Tolkein's Lord of the Rings combines the two, revolves around getting object Y (The Ring) to place X (Mordor). Writers can weave any number of "equations" using these variables.
Sometimes though, the what and where won't cut it. Sometimes you need a who.
Eh, close enough. |
Or, perhaps they're the only one who knows how to get to X, and will accompany the hero throughout the story. There can be any number of X's, Y's, and Z's in a story. Z-characters, however, are often nost plentiful. They will often take major roles in the plot; specifically a role the main protagonist or villain would not be able to cover. Marlin would not be able to assume Dory's responsibilities as comic relief if she was absent from the final draft of Finding Nemo, but Anchor, Chum, and Bruce could have been roled into one shark and not really altered the end product.
Now, not all genres are this formulaic (the more philosophical and artsy you get as a writer, the less you'll adhere to convention), but looking for the X,Y, and Z can make adventure fiction like The Odyssey much easier to understand.
Brian, I really like how you related math to english. For those of us 'math people,' I found a slight sense of humor in this. I also found the break down of books into equations with variables to be very insightful.
ReplyDeleteI really liked the way that this was put into terms. It was very easy to understand and seemed like a great way to explain long stories to people that may find them daunting. The Finding Nemo example was very nice as well as I have never looked far enough into the movie to make this observation. (The Who picture got me too)
ReplyDeleteYou did a great job of really breaking down epic plots. If you can explain it in the simplest way possible, then it means you really know your stuff. Great job, Brian!
ReplyDelete